- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 15:40:21 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24731 Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |philipj@opera.com --- Comment #1 from Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> --- (In reply to Ian Devlin from comment #0) > If anything the attribute should be re-specified in order to be responsive > so that browser support would be improved. I don't understand how that would work, but it seems counter to what you say next: > Since the specification is there to describe what features are currently > available in browsers, it should be returned to the specification. > And since only Blink has dropped it recently, it is still supported by most > browsers and therefore should remain in the specification. This is going to be true of any widely implemented but unused feature that's removed from the Web platform. For example, document.createAttributeNS was recently removed from Blink, but is still supported in every shipping browser I tested. Should it be added back to http://dom.spec.whatwg.org/? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2014 15:40:22 UTC