- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:09:36 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24679 Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|NEEDSINFO |--- --- Comment #4 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> --- (In reply to steve faulkner from comment #3) > Status: needsinfo > Change Description: no change > Rationale: a number of assertions are made about the usefulness of > attributes to indicate whether a table is a data table or not, please > re-open the bug when you have provided some quantitative data to support > these assertions. I am not a mechanical duck that does whatever I am told. I need to understand why am supposed to do something. You ask me to provide quantitative data. Please convince why only quantitative data matters. For instance, it borders on absurd to ask for quantitative data for why table@sortable should not count as evidence for non-layout table. Further more, as this this bug also points to table@border, based on a collection of data provided by yourself, be aware that you with the above statement also dismisses your own data. I reopend this bug to have you 1) reevaluate wheter only quantiative data matters 2) to have provide an evaluation of the claims made. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 15 February 2014 16:09:41 UTC