[Bug 20707] Please add a Scope section per the qualification of the TAG's support for REC track publication

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20707

Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-i
                   |                            |ua.no

--- Comment #1 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> ---
(In reply to comment #0)

>  * XML-based HTML tools or systems intended
>    for the most general contexts of use cannot
>    depend on polyglot input: for maximum flexibility,
>    such tools should use the technique of using an
>    HTML parser that produces an XML-compatible DOM or
>    event stream

In the context of Polyglot Markup, then the above doesn’t adequately express
what "maximum flexibility" implies. As a specification of polyglot markup -
which *itself* is a format for "maximum flexibility" (read: maximum
robustness), "maximum flexibility" means that the XML-based HTML tool *must*
output polyglot markup.

The following reformulation expresses what I mean - hopefully Henri is happy
with it too:

   * XML-based HTML tools or systems intended
     for the most general contexts of use cannot
     depend on polyglot input: for maximum flexibility
<ins>when creating polyglot markup with</ins> such tools,
<del>such</del><ins>the</ins> tools should use the technique of using an
     HTML parser that produces an XML-compatible DOM or
     event stream

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Saturday, 19 January 2013 11:37:16 UTC