- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:13:35 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20707
Bug ID: 20707
Summary: Please add a Scope section per the qualification of
the TAG's support for REC track publication
Classification: Unclassified
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: CR HTML/XHTML Compatibility Authoring Guide (ed: Eliot
Graff)
Assignee: eliotgra@microsoft.com
Reporter: hsivonen@iki.fi
QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Dec/0082.html from the
TAG.
The email says, in part:
“
We understand that the HTML WG is currently debating whether to publish the
Polyglot draft as a Recommendation or a Note. We support the publication of the
Polyglot draft as a Recommendation, with the addition of a Scope section that
makes the intended uses of polyglot clear. The scope should indicate that
* the use of polyglot is suitable as an
option for tool chains that operate in
controlled environments and for authoring
tools
* XML-based HTML tools or systems intended
for the most general contexts of use cannot
depend on polyglot input: for maximum flexibility,
such tools should use the technique of using an
HTML parser that produces an XML-compatible DOM or
event stream
Making these points would make it clearer what polyglot is being recommended
for, and what it is not being recommended for.
”
Please add a Scope section that communicates the points outlined in the TAG
email.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 18 January 2013 12:13:36 UTC