- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:13:35 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20707 Bug ID: 20707 Summary: Please add a Scope section per the qualification of the TAG's support for REC track publication Classification: Unclassified Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: CR HTML/XHTML Compatibility Authoring Guide (ed: Eliot Graff) Assignee: eliotgra@microsoft.com Reporter: hsivonen@iki.fi QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Dec/0082.html from the TAG. The email says, in part: “ We understand that the HTML WG is currently debating whether to publish the Polyglot draft as a Recommendation or a Note. We support the publication of the Polyglot draft as a Recommendation, with the addition of a Scope section that makes the intended uses of polyglot clear. The scope should indicate that * the use of polyglot is suitable as an option for tool chains that operate in controlled environments and for authoring tools * XML-based HTML tools or systems intended for the most general contexts of use cannot depend on polyglot input: for maximum flexibility, such tools should use the technique of using an HTML parser that produces an XML-compatible DOM or event stream Making these points would make it clearer what polyglot is being recommended for, and what it is not being recommended for. ” Please add a Scope section that communicates the points outlined in the TAG email. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 18 January 2013 12:13:36 UTC