- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 22:37:30 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13057 Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com> 2011-06-26 22:37:29 UTC --- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the Editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the Tracker Issue; or you may create a Tracker Issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: We only introduce new elements and attributes for extremely common use-cases, and there is no reason to believe this use-case is extremely common. The low uptake of <ins> and <del> is fairly strong evidence that they don't serve a very common need. As such, introducing new attributes to have a similar effect would waste implementer effort that could be better spent on more useful features, and further complicated an already extremely complicated language. Use-cases like this that are not extremely common are why we have extensibility points like class, data-*, and microdata. If the <ins> and <del> tags are a real problem for major WYSIWYG editors, I encourage them to innovate using existing extension points. If the feature is popular and successful, they can then report back on the results, including real-world cases where attributes are used successfully but <ins> and <del> don't work. At that point, if there's evidence of widespread usage of the extensions, it might be worthwhile to consider standardization. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 26 June 2011 22:37:31 UTC