- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 19:13:19 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12564 Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com> 2011-06-24 19:13:18 UTC --- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the Editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the Tracker Issue; or you may create a Tracker Issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: As far as I understand the issue, there's significant demand and use-cases for out-of-band text tracks, and implementers are interested in supporting them. Thus a specification is needed to ensure that implementers all support the same format. If you don't think implementers should spend their time on out-of-band tracks, I suggest you take it up with them, so that no specification is needed; this kind of decision is not made by specification editors. Authors who prefer to use in-band tracks can do that instead -- nothing's stopping them. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 24 June 2011 19:13:21 UTC