- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:23:33 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12952 --- Comment #11 from Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net> 2011-06-23 21:23:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > http://www.google.com/codesearch#search/&q=typemustmatch%20lang:html&type=cs > > It doesn't break the Web. (If the handling of <object> would be made stricter > without a new attribute, that would be breaking the Web.) Actually, it does break the web, if we talk about web of the future as well as web of the past. This attribute change makes an assumption that the only way to safely use this attribute is if all browsers have implemented it. We don't have concurrence from all browsers to implement this. According to the editor, this attribute will break if people use it without being able to test, first. I am not making this assertion, the editor is. If the people proposing the addition of this attribute bring it up in the HTML WG, and all implementors of all browsers agree with its purpose, and all agree that they will, eventually implement it, then it makes sense to consider adding this attribute. But there's been no confirmation from any browser implementor about implementing this attribute, much less all of them. And, in the editor's own words, without this across the board agreement, the use of this attribute will not only not work, but could very well break pages of any person using the attribute. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2011 21:23:39 UTC