- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:17:33 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13007 --- Comment #14 from Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> 2011-06-22 08:17:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Offtopic: It might be worth asking on the schema.org mailing list if itemid > > actually means anything when used with their vocabulary. > > The issue has more to do with expected behavior than schema.org. I just used > them as an example. > > When you use the same @itemid on the page, is the expected behavior that: > > 1) All properties for the same @itemid are merged with two separate items on > the page. > 2) All properties and types for the same @itemid are merged. > 3) What happens when somebody does a getItems() and uses one of the itemtypes - > are all properties returned? > > I'll delve down deeper into the spec later on tonight, but this was surprising > to me. With RDFa and RDF in general, all things w/ the same "@itemid" would be > merged into a single object with multiple types when retrieved via the RDFa > API. Manu, can you file a separate bug for this? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2011 08:17:35 UTC