[Bug 12918] New: I found that you limited the keywords acceptable for the meta-name attribute and for the link-rel attribute. In the specs you use exhaustive lists of allowed keywords. In my opinion you should only suggest keywords. See also http://webhel.blogspot.com/20

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12918

           Summary: I found that you limited the keywords acceptable for
                    the meta-name attribute and for the link-rel
                    attribute. In the specs you use exhaustive lists of
                    allowed keywords. In my opinion you should only
                    suggest keywords. See also
                    http://webhel.blogspot.com/20
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
               URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#top
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
        AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
        ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
                    public-html@w3.org


Specification: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html
Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#top

Comment:
I found that you limited the keywords acceptable for the meta-name attribute
and for the link-rel attribute. In the specs you use exhaustive lists of
allowed keywords. In my opinion you should only suggest keywords. See also 
http://webhel.blogspot.com/2011/06/bad-value-for-attribute-name-on-element.htm
l 

Hope you will change this. 

Thanks and best regards,
Hans


Posted from: 82.168.147.190
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like
Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.77 Safari/534.24

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2011 20:44:53 UTC