- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:13:01 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12839
Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hsivonen@iki.fi
--- Comment #2 from Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> 2011-06-01 10:12:59 UTC ---
I request resolving this by comparing identifiers code-point-for-code-point
without normalization before comparison.
(In reply to comment #0)
> private tests of today's user agents (IE8, Firefox4, Opera11, Safari, Chrome)
> shows that
>
> that <a href="#å">link</a> targets <p id="å">
> whereas <a href="#å">link</a> targets <p id="å">
Are you sure you meant exactly what you wrote? You next paragraph suggests that
you didn't?
> Thus, today's user agents do actually treat them as unique identifiers, despite
> that they both refer to the same "å" (å).
>
> However, in order toi avoid author confusion as well as user confusion, this
> should not be considered valid.
Until very recently, Validator.nu treated failure to be in NFC as an error. Now
it treats it as a warning, because there was no normative trail from HTML5 to
charmod-norm C300.
Note to Hixie: If you contemplate adding a normative trail to charmod-norm
C300, I suggest pinging the W3C i18n group first, since they might not like
what charmod-norm says anymore.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 10:13:03 UTC