- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 18:48:05 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13345
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ian@hixie.ch
--- Comment #2 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-07-24 18:48:05 UTC ---
I don't think this makes much sense. It renders as a block-level widget.
<details> is completely inappropriate for inline rationale. It's not a footnote
element. It's specifically and exclusively intended to be a disclosure triangle
widget.
If we want a footnote element then we should add a footnote element.
<details> is intended to be essentially be parallel to <fieldset>, the
difference being that the group can be collapsed if it's a <details> element.
(As a side-note, I believe this would be the first time we'd be allowing <p>s
to be nested. I think keeping the language consistent in that you can never
nest <p>s is a good thing.)
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 24 July 2011 18:48:07 UTC