[Bug 12489] Conversion example of Julian/proleptic Greogrian date issues

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12489

Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |ian@hixie.ch
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX

--- Comment #1 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-04-14 06:55:19 UTC ---
I agree that there's no doubt, but that's still not an explicit statement
regarding which calendar the date refers to, so the comment (which by the way
is removed in the w3c version now) is still true. As to the date, it's the
commonly used date, and that's good enough for our purposes. We're not writing
a historical treatise here, it's an example.

EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: It's just an example, it could be completely wrong and it still
wouldn't really matter.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 06:55:22 UTC