- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 01:25:39 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12489 Summary: Conversion example of Julian/proleptic Greogrian date issues Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC URL: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/common-microsyntaxes#glob al-dates-and-times OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch ReportedBy: xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org, public-html@w3.org Spec source says: ]] The date of Nero's birth is the 15th of December 37, in the Julian Calendar, which is the 13th of December 37 in the proleptic Gregorian Calendar.</li> <!-- This might not be true. I can't find a reference that gives his birthday with an explicit statement about the calendar being used. However, it seems unlikely that it would be given in the Gregorian calendar, so I assume sites use the Julian one. --> [[ Please replace the above source code with the following source code: ]] The date of Nero's birth is reckoned to be 15th of December 37 in the Julian Calendar, which corresponds to the 13th of December 37 in the proleptic Gregorian Calendar.</li> [[ Justification: 1) there is no doubt that 15th of December refers to a *Julian* calendar. Because it is easy to verify that it is a Julian date. a) The Julian calendar was introduced in year 45 AD in the Roman empire were Nero was emperor. b) A historical source says: "Nero was born at Antium nine months after the death of Tiberius, on the eighteenth day before the Kalends of January". [0] And according to the Roman dating customs (see for instance Rolf Brahde's explanation[1] page 239), then "eightenth day before Kalends of January" corresponds to "15th of December". THEREFORE: The comment with the speculation of whether it is meant Julian calendar or not, shouldbe deleted. 2) However, whether he was born exactly year 37 BC is not complety undisputed. [2] THEREFORE: It makes sense to use wording such "reckoned to be", to signify that one doesn't take it completely for granted. [0] http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Suetonius/12Caesars/Nero*.html#6 [1] http://books.google.com/books?id=kHgyQwAACAAJ [2] http://www.jstor.org/pss/4434858 -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 01:25:41 UTC