W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > April 2011

[Bug 12486] "Editable" would be simpler if you defined it recursively

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:06:49 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QA3Wj-0001Wu-Ks@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12486

Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com
            Summary|"Editable" would be simpler |"Editable" would be simpler
                   |if you defined it           |if you defined it
                   |recursively, like: "An HTML |recursively
                   |element is editable if      |
                   |either its contenteditable  |
                   |attribute is set to the     |
                   |true state, or it is the    |
                   |root element of a Document  |
                   |that has designMode enabled |
            Summary|or its contenteditable att  |

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2011 17:06:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:31:08 UTC