- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:06:35 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12486
Summary: "Editable" would be simpler if you defined it
recursively, like: "An HTML element is editable if
either its contenteditable attribute is set to the
true state, or it is the root element of a Document
that has designMode enabled, or its contenteditable
att
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#con
tenteditable
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
public-html@w3.org
Specification:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/editing.html
Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#contenteditable
Comment:
"Editable" would be simpler if you defined it recursively, like: "An HTML
element is editable if either its contenteditable attribute is set to the true
state, or it is the root element of a Document that has designMode enabled, or
its contenteditable attribute is set to the inherit state and its parent is
editable."
Posted from: 68.175.61.233
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/534.28 (KHTML, like
Gecko) Chrome/12.0.725.0 Safari/534.28
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2011 17:06:37 UTC