- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 08:32:10 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12426 --- Comment #13 from Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> 2011-04-10 08:32:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > The use case for looping over a fragment are no worse than the use cases for > > looping over the complete video. I'm not a fan of that attribute myself, but it > > exists, it has an effect on video elements and it needs to show the expected > > effect when the resource is limited to a fragment, too, which should be looping > > over the fragment rather than the full video. > > Not supporting it is nevertheless a valid option, just like the spec was just > updated to not support looping for synchronized resources. If we find more and more use cases where we disallow @loop, we might as well completely remove it. You can always do the looping through JavaScript with direct setting of currentTime. > The only non-annoying use case for gapless looping that I know of is background > music for games, and I don't think that MF is really helping that use case. Depends on how that music is given - if it's a fragment that needs looping, then it is a use case. But I don't even see @loop giving any advantage over setting currentTime in script - it won't be more gapless IIUC. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 10 April 2011 08:32:13 UTC