- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2010 16:23:33 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10345 --- Comment #10 from Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com> 2010-10-03 16:23:32 UTC --- Behavior when giving negative values for this sort of attribute is all over the place. Some browsers clamp, some browsers wrap, some ignore out-of-range values, some do one thing sometimes and another thing other times. The current spec seems sane to me: make them unsigned longs in the interface, and unsigned longs ignore out-of-range values in content attributes. And the ones we don't want to be 0 also ignore a content attribute of 0. (Not so sure about the reasonableness of throwing exceptions on IDL set, though, unless that consistently happens on out-of-range IDL sets.) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 3 October 2010 16:23:35 UTC