- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2010 05:23:24 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10967
Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-i
| |ua.no
--- Comment #2 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> 2010-10-03 05:23:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > (the name of the current solution, @longdesc, may have
> > contributed to misuse and misunderstanding)
>
> I see no particular reason this is the case. While a small number of the
> @longdesc errors were people writing the description inline, the majority of
> them were just bad urls. It seems that @desclink would be vulnerable to the
> same mistakes.
Could you please describe the difference between "description" as @longdesc
value and "bad urls"?
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 3 October 2010 05:23:25 UTC