- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 11:01:41 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8892 --- Comment #3 from Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> 2010-02-07 11:01:41 --- Maciej wrote: > Tenative personal opinion: I think changes to a draft while Change > Proposals are under consideration can be a constructive step, even if > they do not fully satisfy everyone. Let's say a Change Proposal cites > two problems with the spec in its rationale and the editor fixes one > in the draft. Now there are fewer points of disagreement left to > settle. On the other hand, sometimes preflighting suggested changes > may help avoid bad expectations. Such changes could possibly be if constructive if a history of discord and perception of a power inequity didn't exist in the working group. Real or not, working group members seem to feel disenfranchised by the current process [1] [2] [3] on this point [4]. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0108.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2010Jan/0066.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0137.html [4] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8892#c1 -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 7 February 2010 11:01:42 UTC