- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 13:20:46 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8892 --- Comment #4 from Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> 2010-02-07 13:20:45 --- I'll postulate that the reaction to the changes is addressing a symptom, but not the underlying problem. My observation is when an edit is made in an area related to a Change Proposal that is under active discussion, but that change itself is not accompanied by an email describing the intent and thinking behind the change (was it a baby step? is it thought to address the entire issue? why was this particular approach instead of the one proposed by the change proposal?), then people are left to discover the change, and many tend to react to the change based on their worst possible fears of what might happen. My suggestion is that instead of focusing on the timing of the edits, we should focus on the lack of communication. We should also make it clear that such changes to editor's drafts are provisional, and do not, in them selves, constitute Working Group Decisions. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 7 February 2010 13:20:49 UTC