- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 06:31:11 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8895 --- Comment #1 from Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> 2010-02-07 06:31:10 --- Larry also wrote: "After CfC for FPWD, it isn't clear what happens if there isn't consensus." And I replied: "Clarification: The general expectations are documented in the W3C Process Document here: <http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#first-wd>. In particular, "Consensus is not a prerequisite for approval to publish; the Working Group may request publication of a Working Draft even if it is unstable and does not meet all Working Group requirements." Thus, consensus is not required and it is possible to proceed notwithstanding lack of consensus. But it is also likely that the Chairs will seek to have objections addressed if there is an obvious practical path to doing so. Possible Policy Update: We'll probably say something more specific when documenting the procedure for FPWD." -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 7 February 2010 06:31:12 UTC