- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 06:28:19 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8895
Summary: Document policy for First Public Working Drafts
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: working group Decision Policy
AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org
ReportedBy: mjs@apple.com
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mjs@apple.com, Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com,
rubys@intertwingly.net, mike@w3.org
Larry Masinter wrote:
"If a bug resolution results in the document being split, we seem to be doing a
CfC for publishing the split parts as FPWD. "
I replied:
"Clarification: Publication of a new FPWD is a separate process from the
Decision Policy. Anyone can bring forward a draft at any time, and whether it
was produced as the result of a bug resolution is irrelevant. The existence of
a bug does not remove the need for the standard Call for Consensus that we do
in such cases.
Possible Policy Update: The Chairs believe that we should write a separate
document on the policy for publishing new documents as a First Public Working
Draft. We believe the requirements for a new publication should be fairly
minimal, but at the same time we feel it is only fair that the requirements
should be documented. This will likely be a separate document from the current
Decision Policy, but it may end up a new section in the current policy."
We should definitely document the FPWD requirements somewhere.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 7 February 2010 06:28:21 UTC