- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 06:28:19 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8895 Summary: Document policy for First Public Working Drafts Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: working group Decision Policy AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org ReportedBy: mjs@apple.com QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mjs@apple.com, Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com, rubys@intertwingly.net, mike@w3.org Larry Masinter wrote: "If a bug resolution results in the document being split, we seem to be doing a CfC for publishing the split parts as FPWD. " I replied: "Clarification: Publication of a new FPWD is a separate process from the Decision Policy. Anyone can bring forward a draft at any time, and whether it was produced as the result of a bug resolution is irrelevant. The existence of a bug does not remove the need for the standard Call for Consensus that we do in such cases. Possible Policy Update: The Chairs believe that we should write a separate document on the policy for publishing new documents as a First Public Working Draft. We believe the requirements for a new publication should be fairly minimal, but at the same time we feel it is only fair that the requirements should be documented. This will likely be a separate document from the current Decision Policy, but it may end up a new section in the current policy." We should definitely document the FPWD requirements somewhere. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 7 February 2010 06:28:21 UTC