[Bug 10389] New: why onbitmap? onfile is enough. if you have onbitmap then why not put ondocument and onpdf and onxlsx and so on? onfile is enough

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10389

           Summary: why onbitmap? onfile is enough. if you have onbitmap
                    then why not put ondocument and onpdf and onxlsx and
                    so on? onfile is enough
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
               URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#pee
                    r-to-peer-connections
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
        AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
        ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org


Section:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#peer-to-peer-connections

Comment:
why onbitmap? onfile is enough. if you have onbitmap then why not put
ondocument and onpdf and onxlsx and so on? onfile is enough

Posted from: 78.96.238.7

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 18 August 2010 14:32:05 UTC