- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:22:31 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7689
Nikunj Mehta <nikunj.mehta@oracle.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|NEEDSINFO |
--- Comment #4 from Nikunj Mehta <nikunj.mehta@oracle.com> 2009-09-29 23:22:30 ---
It necessary to be clear about HTTP and HTML requirements around caching.
>From step 7.2 of Section 6.9.4, a non-normative note says
[[
HTTP caching rules, such as Cache-Control: no-store, are ignored for the
purposes of the application cache update process.
]]
This contradiction suggests to me that all cache-related semantics need to be
specified to the same level of rigor.
My proposal is to either be specific in a normative manner about the kinds of
cache semantics that must be ignored or may be permitted. The specific
semantics that are actually applied are then bounded in this range.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 29 September 2009 23:22:40 UTC