W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2009

[Bug 7711] The "strong native semantics" are worded very similarly -- but not quite the same -- for input type=Number, input type=range, and progressbar.

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:33:52 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1MsZ5k-0003sA-D5@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7711


Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |NEEDSINFO




--- Comment #2 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>  2009-09-29 09:33:52 ---
The various differences are intentional and meaningful; not just editorial. Are
there any you think are wrong?

I considered using a bulleted list instead of a comma-separated list in a
sentence, but it didn't seem like much of a win.


> I would also suggest clarifying the aria-valuenow instructions.  As best I can
> tell, it is equal to the value iff the value can be parsed as a number. 
> Otherwise, (only for a range?) it is the default value, if that can be
> calculated.  Otherwise, it is undefined?

Otherwise, it is not specified at all.

I'm not sure what there is to clarify.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 29 September 2009 09:34:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:01 UTC