- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:00:23 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7670 --- Comment #29 from Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> 2009-09-21 18:00:22 --- (In reply to comment #28) > If you look at actual data, here's what you find: Yahoo has published an RDF > vocabulary for videos, which Google has chosen to pick up, prefix notation and > all, without any coordination from the RDFa Task Force: > > http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/supporting-facebook-share-and-rdfa-for.html Have you actually tested that Yahoo! and Google process input (conforming and obvious, conforming but non-obvious, non-confoming, etc.) in a uniform way and in a way that resembles compliance to RDFa albeit in the wrong MIME type? The announcement itself doesn't show that two implementors implemented RDFa interoperably and in compliance with the spec. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 21 September 2009 18:00:31 UTC