W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2009

[Bug 7669] Redefining dt and dd, recommend new element as caption for Figure

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:10:13 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1MpfqX-000823-4a@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7669


Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX




--- Comment #1 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>  2009-09-21 10:10:12 ---
This has been considered many times.

Defining a new element has a number of disadvantages. It means yet another
number for "label"/"heading"/"caption"/"legend"-like semantics (we're up to
about 18 already depending on how you count them), which will lead to at least
as much confusion as reusing <dt>, if not considerably more, as people try to
remember when to use <caption> and when to use <legend> and when to use
<figcaption> (or is it <figlegend>), etc. It also means more awkward parsing
decisions, as well as generally being quite ugly. IMHO <legend> would be
preferable to a new element, even with it's temporary issues with parsing in
legacy browsers.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 21 September 2009 10:10:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:01 UTC