- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 09:46:31 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7670 --- Comment #24 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2009-09-20 09:46:31 --- > I was talking about people who do not read the spec (or any documentation, for > that matter), and just [work] by trial and error. This represents the majority of authors, I believe. This is the target audience for which our deliverables should be designed. It's also the audience most likely to have problems with binding mechanisms that can be separated from the identifiers in the way that the xmlns="" feature (and other proposals like prefixes="") can. > The XHTML2 WG is (or will be) history, and our *chairs* have invited the RDFa > people to publish the HTML+RDFa spec over here. If you're unhappy with that, > you really should discuss this directly with the chairs. I'm following the process the chairs have described that we should follow. I've nothing against RDFa being published, I just have something against RDFa having a rebindable prefix mechanism. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 20 September 2009 09:46:44 UTC