- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:25:54 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7670
Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hsivonen@iki.fi
--- Comment #4 from Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> 2009-09-18 15:25:53 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> The Internet is rife with examples of 'prefixing' mechanisms that seem to work
> just fine.
Could you give examples, please?
> Moreover, RDFa+XHTML is already in wide use, including adoption by major
> players (e.g., Yahoo!, Google). Clearly those people think this solution is
> not too complex.
According to
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Sep/0124.html
and
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Sep/0126.html
Google isn't implementing prefix-based indirection in their support of "RDFa".
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 18 September 2009 15:26:02 UTC