- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 21:24:33 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6853 --- Comment #7 from Nick Levinson <Nick_Levinson@yahoo.com> 2009-09-12 21:24:32 --- >> Google doesn't use If Google doesn't ever use meta keywords, why did testing come up positive and why did they insert them into their own pages? They use them at least sometimes. Maybe they fear encouraging their misuse so they don't talk about them, but still use them. Keywords fill a necessary function and there's no equivalent. Engines can ignore abuse-prone patterns. Tags on their own pages suggest proper use. > Adding terms from Dublin Core I gave up on Dublin Core, and plan to not have it in revised pages, despite the potential value of Library of Congress Subject Headings. Apparently, at least last April-May, DC was for specialized search engines and expansion into Google's space was not in DCMI's plans. It's also complicated and time-consuming, especially for non-XML authors, and LCSH is high-maintenance due to revisions. I asked DCMI to support HTML5 by reserving DC keywords, but I haven't heard back. If we want the DC system even if DCMI isn't interested, an easier solution is to incorporate the whole DC system by a single reference in the WHAT WG wiki to the DC website (DublinCore.org), saving you a lot of entry and maintenance, only reserving the DC prefix so non-DC names are not proposed with the same prefix. Thanks. -- Nick -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 12 September 2009 21:24:48 UTC