W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2009

[Bug 7277] """(This is only a "SHOULD" and not a "MUST" requirement because it has been proven to be impossible.""" There has to be better wording than 'should do the impossible'. Should attempt to verify? Impossible in some cases? JimJJewett@gmail

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:29:44 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1MlKQq-00049E-AB@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7277


Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX




--- Comment #2 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>  2009-09-09 10:29:44 ---
I think the playful way it's written now is fine. It's a bit of a joke to
people who know their computation theory.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 9 September 2009 10:29:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:00 UTC