W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2009

[Bug 7062] replace terms "CDATA element" and "RCDATA element" with... something better

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 04:07:29 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1MlESv-0007ed-KR@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7062





--- Comment #8 from Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org>  2009-09-09 04:07:29 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I don't see why we'd use "character data" instead of the simpler "text".

Because text, as defined in the spec, cannot contain character references. So
it's useful to have a term that means "text mixed with character references".

> Distinguishing between "normal text" and "replaceable text" leads to the
> question of in what sense "normal text" isn't "replaceable".

Yeah, I agree that's a problem with choosing any non-opaque term.

> So I'm still at a loss for a better term than the opaque "RCDATA".

I agree that the term "RCDATA element" as defined in the spec is unambiguous.

So... lacking anything new to say here and no better suggestions than what I've
given so far, I'm fine with you moving this to FIXED if you don't think there
are any remaining changes that could be made.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 9 September 2009 04:07:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:00 UTC