W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2009

[Bug 7540] New: Spec for metadata extensions does not define which states are allowed/conforming

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 21:00:00 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-7540-2486@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7540

           Summary: Spec for metadata extensions does not define which
                    states are allowed/conforming
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: HTML5 spec bugs
        AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org
        ReportedBy: mjs@apple.com
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org


The spec for meta extensions (currently section 4.2.5.2) defines three statuses
for extensions (Proposal, Accepted, and Unendorsed) and says that conformance
checkers must check the wiki to determine whether a meta name value is allowed.
However, it does not say which of these three statuses count as allowed - is it
only the Accepted status, Accepted and Proposal status, or all three statuses
that count as allowed for validators (and therefore presumably conforming)? The
wiki page does not make this clear either. The spec should be explicit about
this.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 7 September 2009 21:00:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:00 UTC