- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 21:00:00 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7540
Summary: Spec for metadata extensions does not define which
states are allowed/conforming
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: HTML5 spec bugs
AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org
ReportedBy: mjs@apple.com
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org
The spec for meta extensions (currently section 4.2.5.2) defines three statuses
for extensions (Proposal, Accepted, and Unendorsed) and says that conformance
checkers must check the wiki to determine whether a meta name value is allowed.
However, it does not say which of these three statuses count as allowed - is it
only the Accepted status, Accepted and Proposal status, or all three statuses
that count as allowed for validators (and therefore presumably conforming)? The
wiki page does not make this clear either. The spec should be explicit about
this.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 7 September 2009 21:00:10 UTC