- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 10:26:50 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6853 --- Comment #6 from Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 2009-09-07 10:26:49 --- (In reply to comment #5) > > - meta/@name=keywords is in HTML 4 > > That is irrelevant. No, it's not irrelevant. > > - search engine documentation implies it is used > > Google doesn't use it. Some search engines do, as described in the comments > above, but then search engines also use all kinds of other metadata names like > terms from Dublin Core, and we're not going to put all those in HTML5 either. Adding terms from Dublin Core is defined in DC-HTML, which uses the @profile extension point. > > So it appears that the burden of proof is on those who want it to be removed. > > HTML5 started with a clean slate. The burden of proof is _always_ on the > request to add a feature. We disagree on whether this constitutes "adding a feature". > ... I think this remains a bug, even if you close it as "WONTFIX". At some point, the WG will need to decide. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 7 September 2009 10:26:59 UTC