[Bug 8107] I dont think that itemid should be prohibited if there is no itemtype. Several of the use cases would work fine with an id but no type from bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org on 2009-10-28 (public-html-bugzilla@w3.org from October 2009)

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:15:52 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1N32l6-0005oF-UR@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8107





--- Comment #7 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>  2009-10-28 07:15:52 ---
But in the absence of a statement to the contrary, a URL is just a reference to
a resource (for HTTP URLs, what we consider a Web page), not a unique
identifier. The only thing it identifies is the Web page. It seems very
misleading to be encouraging people to use URLs to do something else.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 28 October 2009 07:15:56 UTC