[Bug 8107] I dont think that itemid should be prohibited if there is no itemtype. Several of the use cases would work fine with an id but no type from bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org on 2009-10-28 (public-html-bugzilla@w3.org from October 2009)

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:45:40 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1N32Hs-0003xp-6K@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8107





--- Comment #5 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>  2009-10-28 06:45:39 ---
So what would the itemid="" URL represent if there was no type to define it?


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 28 October 2009 06:45:41 UTC