- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:52:29 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7978 --- Comment #11 from Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> 2009-10-26 14:52:29 --- (In reply to comment #9) > So I'm trying to understand the change linked to in comment 6. What behavior > does it give for the following document: > > <body> > <table> > <form><tr><td><input name="one"></td></tr></form> > <form><tr><td><input name="two"></td></tr></form> > </table> > <input name="three"> > <form><input name="four"></form> > <input name="five"> > </body> > > ? What does the DOM look like? Like this XML: <body> <table> <form/><tbody><tr><td><input name="one"/></td></tr> <form/><tr><td><input name="two"/></td></tr> </tbody></table> <input name="three"/> <form><input name="four"/></form> <input name="five"/> </body> > Which input is associated with which form? Same as before. "three" and "five" aren't associated with any form; "one", "two" and "four" are associated with the form you'd expect. > How does that compare to what UAs do currently? http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/saved/292 In this case it seems to match old Gecko, WebKit and Opera (even though Opera has a different strategy for dealing with forms in tables currently). The association should match IE, too. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 26 October 2009 14:54:42 UTC