- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 07:46:18 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8000 steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |faulkner.steve@gmail.com Keywords| |TrackerRequest --- Comment #2 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> 2009-10-23 07:46:17 --- I have raised an issue in the HTML WG tracker http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/85 (In reply to comment #1) > EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are > satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If > you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please > reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML > Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest > title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue > yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: > http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html > Status: Rejected > Change Description: no spec change > Rationale: I concurr with Thomas in this e-mail: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Oct/0707.html > It seems to me that we _should_ be calling authors out on this kind of mistake. > Just because people do something doesn't mean we should make it valid — after > all, we made <font> invalid, along with many other things. Conformance is about > trying to advise authors to do the right thing. > I have added text to the spec that encourages conformance checkers to be very > careful about how they complain about these issues, by the way, so that authors > aren't encouraged to remove ARIA support but are instead encouraged to use the > right elements. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 23 October 2009 07:46:19 UTC