- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 07:46:18 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8000
steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |faulkner.steve@gmail.com
Keywords| |TrackerRequest
--- Comment #2 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> 2009-10-23 07:46:17 ---
I have raised an issue in the HTML WG tracker
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/85
(In reply to comment #1)
> EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
> satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
> you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
> reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
> Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
> title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
> yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
> Status: Rejected
> Change Description: no spec change
> Rationale: I concurr with Thomas in this e-mail:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Oct/0707.html
> It seems to me that we _should_ be calling authors out on this kind of mistake.
> Just because people do something doesn't mean we should make it valid — after
> all, we made <font> invalid, along with many other things. Conformance is about
> trying to advise authors to do the right thing.
> I have added text to the spec that encourages conformance checkers to be very
> careful about how they complain about these issues, by the way, so that authors
> aren't encouraged to remove ARIA support but are instead encouraged to use the
> right elements.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 23 October 2009 07:46:19 UTC