- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:39:25 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7806 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #23 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2009-10-22 12:39:24 --- "SHOULD" doesn't mean "MAY". It's a must in the Atom WG because (I presume) they assumed that it wouldn't be difficult to come up with unique IDs, and thus all software could do it. I do not share that assumption. Not following the SHOULD in the HTML5 spec means you are violating Atom, which isn't ok, but that's a problem for the Atom spec. I do not think that being unable to generate a stable ID should be grounds for saying you aren't conforming to HTML, even if you aren't conforming to Atom. EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: I think the spec is making the right tradeoff here. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 22 October 2009 12:39:26 UTC