- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:43:57 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7973
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2009-10-22 10:43:57 ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
Status: Accepted
Change Description: see diff given below
Rationale:
Unless I've made a mistake, the spec only used the term "valid URL" in the
authoring conformance criteria, and then only because otherwise people like you
argue that since the spec doesn't _say_ that you have to follow the other
specs, you don't actually have to follow the other specs.
In the interests of moving on with my life, I've added the redundant word
"valid" here also.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 22 October 2009 10:44:01 UTC