- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:43:56 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7964 --- Comment #4 from Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> 2009-10-21 10:43:56 --- No, I'm waiting for some kind of conclusion on the discussion started at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Oct/0581.html As it stands: Using algorithm-order requires a fair bit of complexity to avoid loops and cannot reuse general collection code which only supports document-order. Using document-order would require either first doing the above and then sorting, or first doing a more limited traversal to determine which id's should be included and after that walking the entire document. Both are more complex than any other type of collection, neither is impossible, but my guesstimate is that algorithm-order for everything (including the NodeList returned by .getItems()) would be easier, but as I said I'm waiting for the conclusion of the above discussion to see if there can't be an <itemref>-free solution. Leaving as NEEDSINFO, myself being the one who needs info. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 21 October 2009 10:43:58 UTC