- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 13:32:57 -0600
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOk_reHNLSHXjD5Vs-OwM6-jZnqEATcdrrz9+hV3Q4QHueJQLA@mail.gmail.com>
On a document processing note... You are creating a lot of the boilerplate by using the ReSpec processing of URI query strings. That's great, but makes the URI look a little ugly. I would suggest that you set those options in the ReSpec head in your source so that document viewers get a consistent view of the draft even if they don't add all the cruft onto the URI. On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks paul, will fix > > -- > > Regards > > SteveF > HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> > > On 3 March 2015 at 11:25, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> wrote: > >> Minor comments: >> >> >> >> 1. Many of the links in this document that are pointers into the HTML >> spec do not point to the HTML 5.1 specification. For example >> http://www.w3.org/TR/html/infrastructure.html#strong-native-semantics. >> Given that the Normative Reference is now to HTML 5.1 I would have expected >> these links to point to at either the HTML 5.1 WD on the TR page or to the >> HTML 5.1 Editor’s Draft. >> >> >> >> 2. “The following table describes the default implicit ARIA semantics >> that apply to HTML elements as defined in the HTML Accessibility API >> Mappings specification” >> >> >> >> This text includes a link to the upcoming “HTML Accessibility API >> Mappings 1.0” Editor’s Draft at >> http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/html-aam/html-aam.html. This should >> be added to the Normative References and eventually should refer to the >> FPWD when it is published itself. >> >> >> >> 3. Status section >> >> >> >> It would be useful if the Status section could include information on >> bugs ie https://github.com/webspecs/html-aria/issues and maybe where the >> reader could find the github version in order to make a pull request ie >> https://github.com/webspecs/html-aria >> >> >> >> /paulc >> >> >> >> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada >> >> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 >> >> Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 >> >> >> >> *From:* Steve Faulkner [mailto:faulkner.steve@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2015 1:14 PM >> *To:* Sam Ruby >> *Cc:* public-html-admin@w3.org >> *Subject:* Re: process for getting ARIA in HTML to 1st public working >> draft >> >> >> >> Hi Sam, >> >> >> fixed - new link >> >> http://rawgit.com/webspecs/html-aria/master/index.src.html?specStatus=FPWD;publishDate=2015-03-11;wg=HTML%20Working%20Group;wgURI=http://www.w3.org/html/wg/;wgPublicList=public-html >> >> >> -- >> >> Regards >> >> SteveF >> >> HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> >> >> >> >> On 3 March 2015 at 09:54, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 03/03/2015 12:48 PM, Steve Faulkner wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> here is a FPWD version of ARIA in HTML >> >> http://rawgit.com/webspecs/html-aria/master/index.src.html?specStatus=FPWD;publishDate=2015-03-11;wg=HTML%20Working%20Group;wgURI=http://www.w3.org/html/wg/ >> >> >> looks like mailing list info is missing? >> >> "please send them to @w3.org (subscribe, archives). All comments are >> welcome." >> >> - Sam Ruby >> >> -- >> >> Regards >> >> SteveF >> HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> >> >> On 3 March 2015 at 07:11, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com >> <mailto:faulkner.steve@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Thanks Sam, >> >> will work with Robin. >> >> -- >> >> Regards >> >> SteveF >> HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> >> >> On 3 March 2015 at 05:20, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net >> <mailto:rubys@intertwingly.net>> wrote: >> >> On 03/02/2015 07:43 AM, Steve Faulkner wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> The ARIA in HTML spec is getting close to the point (i >> think) where it >> will be ready for publication as a WD >> https://specs.webplatform.org/__html-aria/webspecs/master/ >> <https://specs.webplatform.org/html-aria/webspecs/master/> >> >> What is the process for making this happen? >> >> Note the html 5.1 nightly WAI-ARIA section has been updated >> to point to >> ARIA in HTML along with the Acc API spec >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/__drafts/html/master/#wai-aria >> <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/#wai-aria> >> >> >> After checking with the domain lead (PLH) and others, a new CfC >> for a FPWD is required. That being said: the presence of bugs >> (e.g. in the links from and to the HTML spec) are not a >> concern. And this document can start out with the 2014 process, >> so a single CfC should suffice. And finally, the fact that much >> of this content has previously been published should make this >> easier. This means that the WG review will most likely focus on >> things like the status section. >> >> Such a section is not present in the webplatform document you >> linked above. >> >> Netting this all out: if you can work with Robin to prepare a >> version of this document that would be suitable for publishing >> by Echidna[1], I can start a CfC which will run for 7 days. >> Once that is successfully complete, you should be able to update >> the document at will. >> >> -- >> >> Regards >> >> SteveF >> HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/__drafts/html/master/ >> <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>> >> >> >> https://github.com/w3c/__echidna/wiki/How-to-use-__Echidna >> <https://github.com/w3c/echidna/wiki/How-to-use-Echidna> >> >> >> >> > > -- Shane McCarron Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 3 March 2015 19:33:25 UTC