- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 09:54:32 +0100
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- CC: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
On 03/03/2015 20:32 , Shane McCarron wrote: > On a document processing note... > > You are creating a lot of the boilerplate by using the ReSpec processing > of URI query strings. That's great, but makes the URI look a little > ugly. I would suggest that you set those options in the ReSpec head in > your source so that document viewers get a consistent view of the draft > even if they don't add all the cruft onto the URI. I don't think that URL aesthetics are a consideration for a CfC. Most of the boilerplate required in W3C specifications is, quite frankly, cruft accumulated over the years much of which we could do without. I actually reckon it's pretty sensible to put as little as possible of it in the document and only override it on the URL when necessary. It keeps things simple where they need to be. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Wednesday, 4 March 2015 08:54:37 UTC