Re: process for getting ARIA in HTML to 1st public working draft

Thanks paul, will fix

--

Regards

SteveF
HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>

On 3 March 2015 at 11:25, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> wrote:

>  Minor comments:
>
>
>
> 1. Many of the links in this document that are pointers into the HTML spec
> do not point to the HTML 5.1 specification.  For example
> http://www.w3.org/TR/html/infrastructure.html#strong-native-semantics.
> Given that the Normative Reference is now to HTML 5.1 I would have expected
> these links to point to at either the HTML 5.1 WD on the TR page or to the
> HTML 5.1 Editor’s Draft.
>
>
>
> 2. “The following table describes the default implicit ARIA semantics that
> apply to HTML elements as defined in the HTML Accessibility API Mappings
> specification”
>
>
>
> This text includes a link to the upcoming “HTML Accessibility API Mappings
> 1.0” Editor’s Draft at
> http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/html-aam/html-aam.html.  This should be
> added to the Normative References and eventually should refer to the FPWD
> when it is published itself.
>
>
>
> 3. Status section
>
>
>
> It would be useful if the Status section could include information on bugs
> ie https://github.com/webspecs/html-aria/issues and maybe where the
> reader could find the github version in order to make a pull request ie
> https://github.com/webspecs/html-aria
>
>
>
> /paulc
>
>
>
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
>
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
>
> Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
>
>
>
> *From:* Steve Faulkner [mailto:faulkner.steve@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2015 1:14 PM
> *To:* Sam Ruby
> *Cc:* public-html-admin@w3.org
> *Subject:* Re: process for getting ARIA in HTML to 1st public working
> draft
>
>
>
> Hi Sam,
>
>
> fixed - new link
>
> http://rawgit.com/webspecs/html-aria/master/index.src.html?specStatus=FPWD;publishDate=2015-03-11;wg=HTML%20Working%20Group;wgURI=http://www.w3.org/html/wg/;wgPublicList=public-html
>
>
>    --
>
> Regards
>
> SteveF
>
> HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>
>
>
>
> On 3 March 2015 at 09:54, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 03/03/2015 12:48 PM, Steve Faulkner wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> here is a FPWD version of ARIA in HTML
>
> http://rawgit.com/webspecs/html-aria/master/index.src.html?specStatus=FPWD;publishDate=2015-03-11;wg=HTML%20Working%20Group;wgURI=http://www.w3.org/html/wg/
>
>
> looks like mailing list info is missing?
>
> "please send them to @w3.org (subscribe, archives). All comments are
> welcome."
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
> --
>
> Regards
>
> SteveF
> HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>
>
> On 3 March 2015 at 07:11, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com
> <mailto:faulkner.steve@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Thanks Sam,
>
>     will work with Robin.
>
>     --
>
>     Regards
>
>     SteveF
>     HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>
>
>     On 3 March 2015 at 05:20, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net
>     <mailto:rubys@intertwingly.net>> wrote:
>
>         On 03/02/2015 07:43 AM, Steve Faulkner wrote:
>
>             Hi all,
>             The ARIA in HTML spec is getting close to the point (i
>             think) where it
>             will be ready for publication as a WD
>             https://specs.webplatform.org/__html-aria/webspecs/master/
>             <https://specs.webplatform.org/html-aria/webspecs/master/>
>
>             What is the process for making this happen?
>
>             Note the html 5.1 nightly WAI-ARIA section has been updated
>             to point to
>             ARIA in HTML along with the Acc API spec
>             http://www.w3.org/html/wg/__drafts/html/master/#wai-aria
>             <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/#wai-aria>
>
>
>         After checking with the domain lead (PLH) and others, a new CfC
>         for a FPWD is required.  That being said: the presence of bugs
>         (e.g. in the links from and to the HTML spec) are not a
>         concern.  And this document can start out with the 2014 process,
>         so a single CfC should suffice. And finally, the fact that much
>         of this content has previously been published should make this
>         easier.  This means that the WG review will most likely focus on
>         things like the status section.
>
>         Such a section is not present in the webplatform document you
>         linked above.
>
>         Netting this all out: if you can work with Robin to prepare a
>         version of this document that would be suitable for publishing
>         by Echidna[1], I can start a CfC which will run for 7 days.
>         Once that is successfully complete, you should be able to update
>         the document at will.
>
>             --
>
>             Regards
>
>             SteveF
>             HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/__drafts/html/master/
>             <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>>
>
>
>         https://github.com/w3c/__echidna/wiki/How-to-use-__Echidna
>         <https://github.com/w3c/echidna/wiki/How-to-use-Echidna>
>
>
>
>