I also still object to the use of the term "nuked". Not enough to vote no, but I don't understand why it hasn't been changed. I was pretty sure I submitted a comment to this effect the last time around too. On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote: > Filed at > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28943 > > Philippe > > > > On 07/13/2015 11:02 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > >> On 7/13/15 10:27 AM, Paul Cotton wrote: >> >>> >>> Silence will be taken to mean there is no objection, but positive >>> responses are encouraged. If there are no objections by Monday 20 >>> July, this resolution will carry. >>> >>> >> I still don't think the use of "nuked" in >> <http://w3c.github.io/dom/PR-20150723.html#interface-domerror> is >> optimal. >> >> Did someone object to Glenn's alternate proposal (from a year ago >> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2014JulSep/0020.html>)? >> >> > -- Shane McCarron Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
Received on Monday, 13 July 2015 15:19:14 UTC