- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 07:11:17 -0400
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- CC: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
On 7/10/14 12:25 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: > The language "nuked from orbit soon" and "will be nuked" needs to be > rewritten. This level of informality is inappropriate for a W3C REC > track document. Better to say "expect to be deprecated" or similar. I agree with this proposal (particularly since "nuke" might not translate accurately). > It is annoying that a search for "Warning!" in the document fails (at > least on Chrome and Firefox) because it is injected from a content > style property. This seems a bit like a personal preference to me. As such, I don't think it should block the LCWD publication although if Glenn created a PR that was agreeable to Robin, then I don't see any harm in merging it. > There remains a normative reference to the WHATWG "URL" specification, > which needs to be resolved before moving to REC. It would be well > advised to describe the expected process for doing this in the SoTD > section. I don't think this point should block publication of a LCWD. (I also think the reference policy [1] describes a way to handle this for subsequent publications.) -AB [1] <http://www.w3.org/2013/09/normative-references>
Received on Friday, 11 July 2014 11:11:55 UTC