Re: CfC: Request transition of DOM4 to Proposed Recommendation

Filed at
  https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28943

Philippe


On 07/13/2015 11:02 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> On 7/13/15 10:27 AM, Paul Cotton wrote:
>>
>> Silence will be taken to mean there is no objection, but positive
>> responses are encouraged. If there are no objections by Monday 20
>> July, this resolution will carry.
>>
>
> I still don't think the use of "nuked" in
> <http://w3c.github.io/dom/PR-20150723.html#interface-domerror> is optimal.
>
> Did someone object to Glenn's alternate proposal (from a year ago
> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2014JulSep/0020.html>)?
>

Received on Monday, 13 July 2015 15:06:10 UTC