- From: David (Standards) Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:47:55 +0100
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: public-html-admin@w3.org
On Sep 17, 2014, at 10:44 , Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > On 09/17/2014 05:26 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> On 9/16/14 9:09 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: >>> We're one step closer to the Recommendation but, in light of the >>> normative reference policy [1], the HTML Working Group assumes that the >>> URL spec will advance from its Working Draft status to a more stable >>> status to ensure it is sufficiently stable for a normative reference. >>> The Director is considering whether Working Draft status is sufficient >>> for a normative reference from HTML5. >> >> Would you please elaborate on why the WHATWG's URL spec (that was a >> normative reference in the CR and the draft PR) was not acceptable by >> the Director? > > I'll note that you consider this topic off-topic in the WebApps working group: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014JulSep/0492.html > > Can I ask that you follow your own recommendation and follow up on this topic on the public-w3cprocess list? some of us might think this is off-topic for a list that is concerned with revising the w3c process document. what process revision are you suggesting? David Singer Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2014 09:48:26 UTC