- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 05:44:02 -0400
- To: public-html-admin@w3.org
On 09/17/2014 05:26 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > On 9/16/14 9:09 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: >> We're one step closer to the Recommendation but, in light of the >> normative reference policy [1], the HTML Working Group assumes that the >> URL spec will advance from its Working Draft status to a more stable >> status to ensure it is sufficiently stable for a normative reference. >> The Director is considering whether Working Draft status is sufficient >> for a normative reference from HTML5. > > Would you please elaborate on why the WHATWG's URL spec (that was a > normative reference in the CR and the draft PR) was not acceptable by > the Director? I'll note that you consider this topic off-topic in the WebApps working group: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014JulSep/0492.html Can I ask that you follow your own recommendation and follow up on this topic on the public-w3cprocess list? > -Thanks, AB - Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2014 09:44:31 UTC