Re: CfC: return HTML 5.0 to Last Call

Bryan:

Please consider filing bugs for the items you identify below.

Janina

Bryan Garaventa writes:
> I would like to make a note about section "3.2.7.4 Implicit ARIA Semantics"
> 
> The following is stated for the A tag:
> 
> "If specified, role must be one of the following: link, button, checkbox,
> menuitem, menuitemcheckbox,menuitemradio, tab, or treeitem"
> 
> The following are missing however, radio and option.
> 
> Similarly, the following is stated for the LI element:
> 
> "If specified, role must be one of the following: listitem, menuitem,
> menuitemcheckbox, menuitemradio, option, tab, treeitem or presentation"
> 
> Radio is missing.
> 
> Regarding the OL and UL elements:
> 
> "If specified, role must be one of the following: directory, list, listbox,
> menu, menubar, tablist, toolbar, tree or presentation"
> 
> Radiogroup is missing.
> 
> All the best,
> Bryan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Janina Sajka [mailto:janina@rednote.net] 
> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 7:13 AM
> To: public-html-admin@w3.org
> Cc: W3C WAI Protocols & Formats
> Subject: Re: CfC: return HTML 5.0 to Last Call
> 
> Dear Chairs, WG:
> 
> Please understand that this is NOT an objection to returning HTML 5.0 to LC.
> While the PFWG has not considered a position on this question, all
> indications are that we would support this CfC.
> 
> However, we do believe there is one section of the candidate LC document
> whose RFC2119 status may need to be changed. Therefore, we are requesting
> that the following section be marked "At Risk" for the LC:
> 
> http://htmlwg.org/heartbeat/WD-html5-20140617/dom.html#sec-strong-native-sem
> antics
> 
> PF notes that the normative requirements on user agents in this section are
> not tested and believes that they cannot be appropriately implemented from
> the specification alone. The development of the "HTML Accessibility API
> Mappings" specification will eventually provide the relevant implementation
> guidance, but this document is far from ready at this time.
> 
> Discussion of this issue in PF can be found beginning at:
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2014Jun/0067.html
> 
> I expect the PFWG will file a bug against the HTML 5.0 specification in this
> regard during the coming week.
> 
> Janina
> 
> 
> Sam Ruby writes:
> > In accordance with Plan 2014[1]:
> > 
> >      We think it is likely that the Working Group will make substantive
> >      changes to the document as a result of Candidate Recommendation
> >      Review. Therefore, in accordance with the W3C Process, we will
> >      return to a short Last Call before requesting to advance to
> >      Proposed Recommendation.
> > 
> > the HTML Chairs are issuing a Call for Consensus to return HTML 5.0 to 
> > Last Call.  The document can be found here:
> > 
> >      http://htmlwg.org/heartbeat/WD-html5-20140617/
> > 
> > Silence will be taken to mean there is no objection, but positive 
> > responses are encouraged. If there are no objections by Friday June 
> > 13th, this resolution will carry.
> > 
> > The proposed Last Call Working Draft states:
> > 
> >      The scope of Last Call feedback on this specification is limited to
> >      changes that have taken place during the Candidate Recommendation
> >      phase[2]. The Last Call period is expected to finish on 15 July
> >      2014. Once Last Call comments are addressed, the Working Group
> >      expects to advance this draft to Proposed Recommendation.
> > 
> > Note that some features marked as at risk in the current Candidate 
> > Recommendation were removed[3].  The following features remain in the 
> > draft at this time but may be removed due to lack of implementation:
> > 
> >      the DataCue interface;
> >      <input type=time>;
> >      drag and drop;
> >      the new ruby model.
> > 
> > - Sam Ruby,
> > on behalf of the HTML WG co-chairs
> > 
> > [1] http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/html5-2014-plan.html#plan
> > [2] 
> > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?chfield=bug_status&chfieldf
> > rom=2012-12-17&chfieldto=2014-06-17&chfieldvalue=RESOLVED&component=HT
> > ML5%20spec&list_id=38742&product=HTML%20WG&query_format=advanced
> > [3] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24812
> 
> -- 
> 
> Janina Sajka,	Phone:	+1.443.300.2200
> 			sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net
> 		Email:	janina@rednote.net
> 
> Linux Foundation Fellow
> Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup:	http://a11y.org
> 
> The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
> Chair,	Protocols & Formats	http://www.w3.org/wai/pf
> 	Indie UI			http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/
> 
> 

-- 

Janina Sajka,	Phone:	+1.443.300.2200
			sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net
		Email:	janina@rednote.net

Linux Foundation Fellow
Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup:	http://a11y.org

The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Chair,	Protocols & Formats	http://www.w3.org/wai/pf
	Indie UI			http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/

Received on Thursday, 19 June 2014 02:02:48 UTC